The West Indies board is pleased with the potential revenue from the ICC revamp, but given its team's serial underperformance, will it really?
A bright new future for West Indies cricket dawned last week. At least that's how the WICB interpreted
the comprehensive overhaul of the ICC - initiated unequivocally for
their benefit by India, England and Australia - that it enthusiastically
supported ("after extensive discussions and careful consideration") at
the directors' meeting on Tuesday and Wednesday in Dubai.
There is a certain irony to its ready acceptance of such a radical
transformation to the way the world game is administered. Twice it has
commissioned independent committees to advise on just such change to its
own organisation. Twice it has utterly ignored them.
The remit
of the first, headed by the former Jamaica prime minister PJ Patterson,
was "to consider the composition and structure of the WICB and to make
recommendations which will improve its overall operations, governance
effectiveness, team performance and strengthen its credibility and
public support". The committee presented its comprehensive report in
October 2007. Last year, a frustrated Patterson charged: "I challenge
anyone to point out a single iota or even the semblance of change which
has been made to the composition and structure of the WICB as a result
of our report."
A similar brief was subsequently given to a team of three, under the
chairman of the board's governance committee, Queen's Counsel Charles
Wilkin. It presented its report in January 2012. It has gone the same
way as Patterson's. "The territorial board directors flatly rejected the
recommendations of the governance committee as to the restructuring of
the board and refused to make any change at all to the current
structure," Wilkin, understandably irate, stated in his letter of
resignation.
The main reason for the WICB's contrasting positions is easy to spot.
Patterson and Wilkin both proposed a reduction in the number of
directors, who were not about to vote themselves out of their
prestigious positions. Under the superpowers' takeover of the ICC, the
WICB's internal business was not an issue. The board was obviously
marginalised as a result but it saw financial and other benefits from
toeing the line. Beggars, after all, can't be choosers.
It noted that while the all-powerful BCCI would take a "central
leadership responsibility" of the ICC, the West Indies board would
remain a Full Member with all the attendant rights; its candidates would
even be eligible for election to the presidency and the chairmanship of
the Executive Committee (ExCo) and Financial and Commercial Affairs
Committee (F&CA), both recently established under the restructuring -
though not for at least five years, during which these top posts are
reserved for the Big Three.
There was the assurance that West Indies are no longer in danger of
losing Test status, gained in 1928, or of slipping into a proposed
second division - that, it explained, only applies to those ranked ninth
and tenth in the ICC Test rankings, and, it pointed out, West Indies
are presently seventh (proudly adding that they are also the World
Twenty20 champions).
What is more, under the new "mutually agreed" and "legally binding"
Future Tours Programme, it is possible for West Indies to play more
Tests, ODIs and T20s against higher-ranked opponents, both home and
away. The WICB asserted that, after "initial discussions", India,
England and Australia, "have all committed to increased tours to the
West Indies over the next eight-year cycle [2015-2023]", in addition to
those currently on the existing FTP. They are the only three guaranteed
to earn the WICB a profit on visits by their teams to the Caribbean.
Two additional points are that there are no longer obligations to host
either unprofitable tours - those against anyone but Australia, England
and India - or any during the hurricane season, as has obtained for the
past 20 years.
The clincher, inevitably, involved money.
It came through the proposed sharing of the ICC's revenue between its
members over the eight-year cycle from 2015 to 2023; the WICB has
projected an increase of at least 100% on what it got under the previous
arrangement, between 2006 and 2014. No figure was given; it is
reportedly between US$70 and $80 million. While these numbers pale in
comparison with the $568 million that is slated to go to India in
recognition of the estimated 80% it contributes to the ICC's revenue,
mainly through its media and commercial rights contracts, and even
England's $173 million and Australia's $130.5 million, it is a tidy sum
for a region comprised of small islands with struggling economies and
limited populations.
The question is: how will it be utilised? The WICB's answer is that it
will allow the board "to realistically examine the possibility of a menu
of initiatives and expansions", principally increasing the number of
regional matches in all formats.
Richard Pybus, the new director of cricket, has already recognised the
constraints of the current Nagico Super50 in Trinidad, with its maximum
of five matches a team, minimum of three. It needs to revert to its
2013, non-sponsored format in which each team met the others prior to
the semis and final. The same holds true for the first-class tournament,
now limited to one round.
The promise of an annual Test match fund, conceived to support members
other than the Big Three in hosting loss-making series, provides what
the WICB described as a "financial buffer" for hosting unprofitable
series against lesser teams. At present, West Indies' faltering
standards are part of that equation.
The WICB's optimistic take on what has emerged from Dubai sounds too
good to be true. It has enough previous experience to appreciate that it
often turns out to be. Remember the name Allen Stanford?
We eagerly await further developments.
Tony Cozier has written about and commentated on cricket in the Caribbean for 50 years.

0 comments:
Post a Comment